For the reasons outlined above, memes like these are
criminally stupid:
The person who made this meme is a believer in gun rights,
and so am I. I’m against what’s going on
right now in this country with regards to gun legislation, and so are
they. The similarities end there. The picture above has nothing to do with
debate. This picture is a threat, and
you will not win this debate with threats.
Imagine the following conversation:
You: My favorite ice
cream flavor is chocolate
Them: pulls out knife. Say it’s rocky road, bitch, or I’ll cut
you!!
Congratulations, you’re now officially done with your ice
cream flavor debate. The only conclusion
you’re going to walk away from this encounter with is the impression that all
rocky road ice cream aficionados are bugnuts.
Everyone, regardless of whether they come down on the side
of gun control or gun rights, believes this is an important issue, and for
once, everyone is right. This is really
important. This is too important to be fucking
around like this.
First of all, please understand this: The Vast Majority of people who are for gun
control support it because they believe that gun control can prevent things
like Sandy Hook and the Aurora Movie Theatre shooting. They honestly believe that gun control will
make this country a safer place for them and their children. They really, truly believe this. Are they right? I don’t believe they are, but that’s not the
point. These people, the majority of
them, aren’t monsters. These people
aren’t evil. They want something we all
want: safety for our families.
“But Obama wants to confiscate our guns in preparation for a fascist state”. We can debate that if you want. It’s going to be a lot harder to debate whether or not that the Smiths down the street want a fascist state. I’m 99% certain that what they want is to stop worrying about sending their 6 year old to school. At worst, the Smiths are misguided. They aren’t communists or werewolves.
“But Obama wants to confiscate our guns in preparation for a fascist state”. We can debate that if you want. It’s going to be a lot harder to debate whether or not that the Smiths down the street want a fascist state. I’m 99% certain that what they want is to stop worrying about sending their 6 year old to school. At worst, the Smiths are misguided. They aren’t communists or werewolves.
Here’s how way too much of this debate has looked so far:
Liberals: We need gun
control right now. We have to do
something to stop these mass shootings!
Conservatives:
Conservatives:
I’m a supporter of the second amendment, because I think an
armed populace provides a defense against tyranny. I’m about as libertarian as it’s possible to
be. You know who I’d really prefer didn’t own guns? Someone who is this casual about introducing
violence into a debate. Do these people
understand what civil war would actually mean?
Some people like to fantasize about dying for their country, about
fighting “the man”, about becoming a hero, about learning kung fu. The Last
Psychiatrist explained this point better than I ever could, but I’ll sum
up: if you think that, in the case of a massive civil war against a fascist
government, you would finally get the chance to become a hero, to realize your
full potential, to have your life imbued with meaning, you’re terribly
mistaken. You are not the main character
in a movie about future civil war. You
are one of the extras. So is your
family. Your sons and daughters could
die in this kind of civil war. The uncle
who’s always going on about how great Obamacare is may be annoying at
Thanksgiving, but do you really want to have to shoot him in the face? Do you want to face your grandmother after
you do?
“You’re such a coward”.
No. I’m realistic, and you’re
vainglorious. If the time ever comes in
this country for violence, and I hope with all my soul that it never does, I’ll
fight however I can. You know what I
won’t be doing? Talking. Because if the time has come for war, then
words are worthless, words are a waste of breath. When you post things like this, you are
either bringing threats to a debate or you are talking when you ought to be
shooting.
This is still the time for debate. If it was the time for war, the government
would be indefinitely detaining citizens, instead of passing laws that indirectly authorize it and taking no action. If it was
time for war, the government would be confiscating guns without debate or due
process, not banning assault weapons and attempting to compile a gun
registry. If it was time for war, you
wouldn’t be allowed to openly discuss succession or post pictures like
these. I know we are not a fascist state yet because people are posting these
pictures on Facebook without penalty.
“So what, I’m just supposed to roll over and hand over my
guns?” Absolutely not. DEBATE THIS.
Debate it whenever it comes up.
Debate it on the internet, debate it with your friends, write your congressmen and debate it with them. By debate, I mean,
offer reasons which are more than sound bites.
Really consider the opposition’s points, empathize with them, and then
try to explain why they’re wrong.
Here are some examples of the right way to do this:
Gun Control Supporter Says:
|
A Possible Answer:
|
A Wrong Answer:
|
We have to do something about gun violence in this
country!
|
It’s definitely a problem, and I’m really concerned about
it as well. But wouldn’t you agree
that doing something that makes things worse would actually be worse than
doing nothing? We have to be sure that
gun control laws will actually help things more than they hurt them.
|
You’re retarded—haven’t you read the constitution?
|
European countries that have banned guns have much lower
gun homicide rates than America does!
|
That’s true, but America isn’t Europe. For one thing, guns were never part of most
European cultures. Additionally,
you’ve probably seen the raw numbers: remember that European countries have
much smaller numbers of citizens than America does. Even though gun-related crime is very low
in these countries, many countries in Europe that have banned guns have much
higher rates of violent crime per 100,000 citizens than America does.
|
Maybe you should fucking move to Europe than!
|
Less guns means less gun-related violence!
|
Will gun control laws actually be effective at keeping
guns out of the hands of criminals? It’s
easy to cross the border into Mexico and Canada and buy guns there. The Canadian border is very porous—unless
you can convince Canada to ban guns as well, a United States gun ban isn’t
going to mean much.
|
I’ll show you gun-related violence if you try to take my
Glock-40 away with your stupid fascist laws!
|
Is your right to hunt deer more important than keeping our
kids safe?
|
The 2nd Amendment isn’t about protecting
anyone’s right to hunt deer. It’s in
place in case there ever needs to be armed resistance against a tyrannical
government. Look, I’m not saying
that’s happening now, and I hope to God it doesn’t happen, but it’s happened
across the globe throughout human history.
Ben Shapiro
explains it really well in this clip (around 2:15).
|
The 2nd Amendment isn’t about deer hunting,
it’s about fighting back against fascism!
Didn’t you hear Alex
Jones school Piers Morgan on this issue?
|
I think you’re just a warmongering fuckhead who wants kids
to die!
|
Excuse me? I don’t
want kids to die either. The only
thing we’re disagreeing on is how we can best ensure that American kids have
a future in this country. If you're going to be rude, I'm going to leave.
|
Fuck you, hippie!!
|
This is a serious issue. Let's have a serious discussion. Prove that you are responsible enough to own weapons of war by engaging in civilized, peaceful debate.